Countdown to 12-21-2012 11:11am       (Days, Hours, Minutes, Seconds)

World Truths of the Mayan 5th Night
Home   Mayan Calendar  2012 Videos   The Popol Vuh    Spirituality   Spirituality Videos  Dimensions  
Chakras & Meditation  DNA Upgrade   Affirmations   Law of One   Law of Attraction   Cosmos   UFO's  
Crop Circles   Pole Shift   Nibiru   Miscellaneous 2012   News   Forum   Links
NEW PAGE!: World Truths of the Mayan 5th Night  - It's all coming out!!!    Illuminati   Your Comments
World Truths of the Mayan 5th Night Index
9/11 Coverup     Government     New World Order     Weather & Nature  
  UFO's     Planet X / Nibiru    Miscellaneous     REAL TRUTH HEROES

   

NASA and Planet X
YOWUSA.COM, 12-August-07
Marshall Masters

When discussing Planet X, one inevitably encounters this knee-jerk rejectionist rant. "Well, if Planet X really did exist, our government would tell us about it."

They have, so those of us who actively research the topic ignore these rejectionist rants because we know that they know.

However, for those of you who are new to the topic, or are trying to discuss the subject with others, here are three undeniable speed bumps you can toss under those fast-moving rejectionist rascals. One of which, happens to be a smoking gun!



#1 — NASA and Are We Alone in the Universe?
In a 1992 video, Zecharia Sitchin first offered a revealng excerpt from a 1992 NASA press release.

The Are We Alone in the Universe? video was originally released in 1992 and was poorly re-mastered in 2003. The minute you play it, you know it’s authentic because of Sitchen’s typically wooden performance. Nonetheless, it is a treasure trove for Planet X (Nibiru) researchers. 

Towards the very end of the program, the following CGI text appears, as though it were a last minute find, inserted during the final edit.

NASA Press Release 1992

"Unexplained deviations in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune point to a large outer solar system body of 4 to 8 Earth masses, on a highly tilted orbit, beyond 7 billion miles from the sun."

Sitchin is extremely precise in such matters and this NASA quote is a bombshell. Nonetheless, we vetted this so that we could use this quote in Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide.  To do that, we started with a 2003 interview article on our site by Steve Russell.  In that interview Sitchin states:

Will Planet X / Nibiru Return in 2003?
YOWUSA.COM, 01-June-02

“Some ten years ago the US Government itself, through its Naval Observatory, led the search for "Planet X" and the team's leader, Dr. Harrington, agreed with my ancient evidence. At that time even The New York Times wrote that all that is left regarding the existence of such a post-Plutonian planet is to name it...

I have no doubt that at the right time — right in the eyes of whoever decided these matters — the existence of Nibiru will be officially confirmed.”—Zecharia Sitchin

When discussing Planet X with rejectionists, expect the Eris retort.  “Well they found it silly and it’s called the Eris, the Tenth Planet.”  Ugh… there seems to be this enduring misperception that this lifeless rock is the Planet X / Nibiru that we’ve been looking for since the discovery of Uranus.  Wrong.

Eris object is slightly larger than Pluto and little better than 60% the size of our own moon.  That means it has nowhere near enough mass to be Planet X.  Ergo, it was designated a dwarf planet along with Pluto. 

However, in fairness to this object, it really did get a bum rap.  It was originally named Xena in honor of a certain mega-hot TV babe.  Cool name, but now there’s this Eris renaming nonsense.  What’s with that: Revenge of the socially challenged astro-geeks, part deux?

Back to Sitchin...

In Steve Russell’s interview, Sitchin refers to The New York Times.  Since he lives in New York, Sitchin follows that newspaper with great interest, as do others.

One in particular is John DiNardo.  A few days ago, he emailed me two JPEG images of a 1983 article that appeared in the New York Times. It turned out to be a wonderful bit of synchronicity.

#2 — IRAS, Planet X and the New York Times
On January 26, 1983, NASA launched the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) was launched on January 26, 1983.  Independent Planet X researchers have long held the idea that the IRAS satellite imaged Planet X during its sky survey.

With that thought in mind, enjoy the following New York Times article published just 4 days after the IRAS launch.

Clues Get Warm in the Search for Planet X
The New York Times
Sunday, January 30, 1983
John Noble Wilford

JPEG Images courtesy of John DiNardo: Page 1, Page 2

Something out there beyond the farthest reaches of the known solar system seems to be tugging at Uranus and Neptune.  Some gravitational force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities in their orbits.  The force suggests a presence far away and unseen, a large object that may be the long-sought Planet X.

Evidence assembled in recent years has led several groups of astronomers to renew the search for the 10th planet.  They are devoting more time to visual observations with the 200-inch telescope at Mount Palomar in California.  They are tracking two Pioneer spacecraft, now approaching the orbit of distant Pluto, to see if variations in their trajectories provide clues to the source of the mysterious force.  And they are hoping that a satellite-borne telescope launched last week will detect heat “signatures” from the planet, or whatever it is out there.

The Infrared Astronomical Satellite was boosted into a 560-mile-high polar orbit Tuesday night from Vandenberg Air Force Base, CA.  It represents an $80-million venture by the United States, Britain and the Netherlands.  In the next six or seven months, the telescope is expected to conduct a wide-ranging survey of nearly all the sky, detecting sources not of ordinary light, but of infrared radiation, which is invisible to the human eye and largely absorbed by the atmosphere.  Scientists thus hope that the new telescope will chart thousands or infrared-emitting objects that have gone undetected – stars, interstellar clouds, asteroids and, with any luck, the object that pulls at Uranus and Neptune.

The last time a serious search of the skies was made, it led to the discovery in 1930 of Pluto, the ninth planet.  But the story begins more than a century before that, after the discovery of Uranus in 1781 by the English astronomer and musician William Herschel.  Until then, the planetary system seemed to end with Saturn.

As astronomers observed Uranus, noting irregularities in its orbital path, many speculated that they were witnessing the gravitational pull of an unknown planet.  So began the first planetary search based on astronomers’ predictions, which ended in the 1840’s with the discovery of Neptune almost simultaneously by English, French and German astronomers.

But Neptune was not massive enough to account entirely for the orbital behavior of Uranus.  Indeed, Neptune itself seemed to be affected by a still more remote planet.  In the late 19th century, two American astronomers, William H. Pickering and Percival Lowell, predicted the size and approximate location of the trans-Neptunian body, which Lowell called Planet X.

Years later, Pluto was detected by Clyde W. Tombaugh working at Lowell Observatory in Arizona.  Several astronomers, however, suspected it might not be the Planet X of prediction.  Subsequent observations proved them right.  Pluto was too small to change the orbits of Uranus and Neptune; the combined mass of Pluto and its recently discovered satellite, Charon, is only one-fifth that of Earth’s moon.

Recent calculations by the United States Naval Observatory have confirmed the orbital perturbation exhibited by Uranus and Neptune, which Dr. Thomas C. Van Flandern, an astronomer at the observatory, says could be explained by “a single undiscovered planet.”  He and a colleague, Dr. Robert Harrington, calculate that the 10th planet should be two to five times more massive than Earth and have a highly elliptical orbit that takes it some 5 billion miles beyond that of Pluto – hardly next-door but still within the gravitational influence of the Sun.

Some astronomers have reacted cautiously to the 10th-planet predictions.  They remember the long, futile quest for the planet Vulcan inside the orbit of Mercury; Vulcan, it turned out, did not exist.  They wonder why such a large object as a 10th planet escaped the exhaustive survey by Mr. Tombaugh, who is sure it is not in the two-thirds of the sky he examined.  But according to Dr. Ray T. Reynolds of the Ames Research Center in Mountain View, CA, other astronomers “are so sure of the 10th planet, they think there’s nothing left but to name it.”

At a scientific meeting last summer, 10th-planet partisans tended to prevail.  Alternative explanations for the outer-planet perturbations were offered.  The something out there, some scientists said, might be an unseen black hole or neutron star passing through the Sun’s vicinity.  Defenders of the 10th planet parried the suggestions.  Material falling into the gravitational field of a black hole, the remains of a very massive star after its complete gravitational collapse, should give off detectable x-rays, they noted; no X-rays have been detected.  A neutron star, a less massive star that has collapsed to a highly dense state, should affect the courses of comets, they said, yet no such changes have been observed.

More credence was given to the hypothesis that a “brown dwarf” star accounts for the mysterious force.  This is the informal name astronomers give to celestial bodies that were not massive enough for their thermonuclear furnaces to ignite; perhaps like the huge planet Jupiter, they just missed being self-illuminating stars.

Most stars are paired, so it is not unreasonable to suggest that the Sun has a dim companion.  Moreover, a brown dwarf in the neighborhood might not reflect enough light to be seen far away, said Dr. John Anderson of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA.  Its gravitational forces, however, should produce energy detectable by the Infrared Astronomical Satellite.

Whatever the mysterious force, be it a brown dwarf or a large planet, Dr. Anderson said he was “quite optimistic” that the infrared telescope might fine it and that the Pioneer spacecraft could supply an estimate of the object’s mass.  Of course, no one can be sure that even this discovery would define the outermost boundary of the solar system.

Shortly after we posted this article, John DiNardo must have toasted his library card to the max, because he sent in another great clipping. Oh yah baby, this is the one. The smoking gun!

#3 — IRAS, Planet X and the U.S.
News and World Report
A core premise of recent book, Planet X Forecast and 2012 Survival Guide is that Planet X is a brown dwarf. Dark Star Author, Andy Lloyd who is a frequent guest on Cut to the Chase, also insists that Sol's companion in a brown dwarf.

Yowusa.com's stand in the matter is based on the detailed historical accounts of previous Planet X flybys contained in The Kolbrin Bible. These prescient accounts of the Egyptian and Celtic authors clearly describe a brown dwarf.

With that in mind, read this sidebar printed in the U.S. News and World Report on 1984, detailing an early IRAS find.

Planet X — Is It Really Out There?
U.S. News and World Report, September 10, 1984
JPEG Images courtesy of John DiNardo: Sidebar

Shrouded from the sun's light, mysteriously tugging at the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, is an unseen force that astronomers suspect may be PLanet X — a 10th resident of the Earth's celestial neighborhood.

Last year, the infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS), circling in a polar orbit 560 miles from the Earth, detected heat from an object about 50 billion miles away that is now the subject of intense speculation.



"All I can say is that we don't know what it is yet," says Gerry Neugenbaur, director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Instititute of Technology. Scientists are hopeful that the one-way journeys of the Pioneer 10 and 11 space probes may help to locate the nameless body.

Some astronomers say the heat-emitting object is an unseen collapsed star or possibly a "brown dwarf" — a protostar that never got hot enough to become a star. However, a growing number of astronomers insist that the object is a dar, gaseous mass that is slowly evolving into a planet.

For decades, astromers have noted that the orbits of two huge, distant planets — Neptune and Uranus —deviate slightly from what they should be according to the laws of physics. Gravitational pull from Planet X would explain that deviation.

Morever, says Neugebaur, "if we can show that our own solar system is still creating planets, we'll know that it's happening around other stars, too."

The next time a knee-jerk rejectionist rants on with "Well, if Planet X really did exist, our government would tell us about it," you've got him by the short hairs. Happy tugging!

source:http://yowusa.com/planetx/2007/planetx-2007-08b/1.shtml





NEW PAGE!: World Truths of the Mayan 5th Night  - It's all coming out!!!